检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范叶超[1] FAN Yechao(Center for Studies Sociological Theory & Methodology,Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第2期62-69,共8页Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(13JJD840006)
摘 要:项目措辞方向会对NEP量表在中国应用时的测量质量产生影响吗?利用问卷调查数据,本研究评估了NEP量表在中国大学生群体中的应用情况,并特别关注项目措辞方向差异对量表测量质量的影响。研究发现:(1)项目措辞方向的不一致确实干扰了NEP量表的内部一致性和维度结构,统一方向后,量表的内部一致性明显提升,理论维度也更加明确;(2)统一措辞方向后NEP量表的预测效度并不理想,但在拆解为5个子量表后,预测效度得到了明显改善;(3)统一措辞方向后的NEP量表是大学生环境关心的最佳测量工具。进一步,研究对项目措辞方向为何会影响量表测量质量做出了解释,并明确了未来使用NEP量表应当注意的事项。Will the wording direction of projects affect the measurement quality of the NEP scale in China? Using the question naire survey, this study evaluates the application of NEP scale in Chinese college students' group, with particular attention to the effect of the difference in the wording direction of projects on the measurement quality of the scale. The results show that: ①the inconsistency of wording in the projects did interfere with the in-ternal consistency and dimension structure of the NEP scale. After the unifying of wording direction, the internal consistency of the scale was improved and the theoretical dimension became clearer.②The prediction validity was not satisfactory, but the prediction validity has been improved obviously after the scale was dismantled to 5 subscales.③The NEP scale with unified wording is the best measurement tool for college students' environmental care. The study further explains why the wording of project affects the quality of the gauge measurement and clar-ifies what should be noted in the future application of NEP scale.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229