中外企业博士后基金资助模式及特点的比较研究——以加拿大IRDF和中国CPSF为例  

Research on Grant Models of Postdoctoral of Domestic and Foreign Enterprises and the Features

作　　者：葛昀洲[1] 付瑶瑶[2] 赵文华[3,1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学高等教育研究院 [2]上海交通大学人力资源处 [3]上海交通大学党委办公室

出　　处：《高等工程教育研究》2017年第3期187-191,共5页Research in Higher Education of Engineering

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目规划基金(15YJA880109)研究成果

摘　　要：作为资助企业博士后的国家政府基金,加拿大IRDF基金与我国CPSF基金体现了鲜明的差异。IRDF强调市场导向,贴近学科前沿,注重质量优势;CPSF体现国家意志,面向传统领域,注重规模优势。设立单独面向企业博士后的基金,完善过程中管理,调整考核导向,是我国企业博士后基金未来的发展趋势。Both as national grants for postdoctoral in enterprises, Canada＇s IRDF is quite different from China^s CPSF. IRDF is more market-oriented, close to cutting edge of discipline, and focus on quality. CPSF is directed by the government, close to traditional fields, focuses on scale advantages more. lt^s a trend of development to set postdoctoral funds with setting up separate post-doctoral funds for enterprises, improve the process of management, adjust the orientation of assessment.

关 键 词：企业博士后 基金 IRDF CPSF 

分 类 号：G644.8[文化科学—高等教育学]