论民法上和解合同的客体范围  

On the Object Scope of Compromise Contract in Civil Law

作　　者：邓叶芬[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院,哈尔滨150080 [2]上海海洋大学纪委,上海201306

出　　处：《学术交流》2017年第6期115-121,共7页Academic Exchange

摘　　要：民法上和解合同的客体范围对民法上和解合同制度的完善有着重要的意义,同时也是各国立法与学理中具有争议的一个问题。民法上和解合同的历史源流以及其与相似概念的辨析,论证了民法上和解合同以争执的存在为前提。权利实现与否不确定之情形对应的为明确的无争执的法律关系,防止争执发生之情形对应的为将来发生争执的法律关系,这两种情况都不应当纳入民法上和解合同的客体范围。民法上和解合同的客体范围应当为"终止争执"。此处的争执,一方面指当事人互为对立主张的法律关系之争执,另一方面指非法律关系直接对立但有争议而导致的法律关系不明确之情形。In civil law, the object scope of compromise contract is of significance to the improvement of compromise contract system and it also remains a controversial issue in the legislation and academic theory of each country. The historical origin of compromise contract and the debate of its similar concept demonstrated that dispute was the precondition of compromise contract in civil law. The uncertain rights realization means a defi- nite legal relation with no dispute, while the prevention against dispute represents a dispute relation in future, and neither of them can be covered in the object scope of compromise contract in civil law. In civil law, the object scope of compromise contract should be ＂termination of an argument . And the disputes here, on the one hand, refers to the dispute between the parties on opposing legal relations, on the other hand, means the unclear legal relation of the non-legal relations, which are directly opposed and disputed.

关 键 词：民法上和解 客体范围 终止争执 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]