检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何劲[1] Emmanuel K.Yiridoe 祁春节[1]
机构地区:[1]华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070 [2]达尔豪斯大学农学院
出 处:《经济纵横》2017年第5期118-122,共5页Economic Review Journal
基 金:国家留学基金项目(编号:CSC NO.201506765068);武汉研究院开放性课题(编号:IWHS2016351);中国工程院咨询项目(编号:2015-07-XY-003)资助
摘 要:中国与加拿大虽然国情不同、农业发展水平差别较大,但加拿大家庭农场的制度环境及其发展路径,有许多经验值得借鉴。如,土地产权制度明晰,财政支持机制重点突出且力度大,金融服务主体多元化、服务规范化,农业社会服务高度组织化、专业化,农业法律体系完善且配套性强。借鉴加拿大经验,中国应深化农村土地产权制度改革,加快推进家庭农场规模化经营;构建综合配套的财政支持政策体系,增强家庭农场发展实力;构建新型农村金融服务体系,支撑家庭农场做大做强;构建多元高效的现代农业服务体系,促进家庭农场提效增收;构建系统完善的农业法律体系,保障家庭农场可持续发展。Although situation and level of agricultural development of China and Canada are different,but there are many experiences about institutional environment and development path of family farms in Canada worth learning from. The experiences are as follows: clear land property rights system,focused and strong fiscal support mechanism,diversified financial services bodies and standardization financial service,highly organized and professional socialization agricultural service,perfect and strong matching agricultural legal system. Through learning from Canadian experiences,China should deepen the reform of rural land property rights system so as to accelerate scale business of family farms,build comprehensive fiscal support policy system so as to strengthen the development of family farms,build new rural financial service system so as to support family farms to be bigger and stronger,build multiple efficient modern agricultural service system so as to promote family farms to improve their efficiency and increase income,and build perfect agricultural legal system so as to guarantee the sustainable development of family farms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117