检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学西南医院手术麻醉科,重庆400038
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2017年第9期106-108,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基 金:重庆市医学科学研究项目(WX11C10)
摘 要:目的探讨不同麻醉方式对腹部手术患者循环状态及T淋巴细胞亚群的影响。方法选取120例腹部手术患者,将其分为A组(全麻组)和B组(硬膜外复合全麻组),比较2组患者不同时间点的血流动力学指标、心排量指标及外周血T淋巴细胞亚群指标。结果术中5 min、术中30 min及术后5 min,B组的血流动力学指标均显著低于A组(P<0.05),术后1 d及3 d时B组的外周血T淋巴细胞亚群指标均显著好于A组(P<0.05)。结论硬膜外复合全麻对腹部手术患者循环状态及T淋巴细胞亚群的影响较小,更适用于腹部手术患者。Objective To explore the influence of different anesthesia methods on the circulation state and T lymphocyte subsets of patients with abdominal operation. Methods A total of 120 patients with abdominal operation were divided into group A (general anesthesia group)and group B (epidural combined anesthesia group). The hemodynamic indexes, cardiac output indexes and peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets at different time points were analyzed and compared between two groups. Results The hemodynamic indexes at 5 rain and 30 min during the operation and 5 rain after the operation in the group B were significantly lower than those iu the group A (P 〈 0.05), and the peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets of group B at first and third day after the operation were significantly better than group A ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The effect of epidural general anesthesia on the eireulatory status and T lymphoeyte subsets in patients with abdominal operation is less, which is more suitable for patients with abdominal surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222