检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学国际关系学院 [2]中山大学南海战略研究院
出 处:《亚太经济》2017年第3期68-73,共6页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
摘 要:以金砖国家为代表的新兴经济体不但是全球气候治理的参与者,更应该积极充当"稳定之锚",以"知识型权威"定位帮助各方建构新的认知,从而引领《巴黎协定》的广大参与方、缔约方共同推动协定的实施,为推进全球气候治理提供金砖力量。基于气候治理体系各方的认知变化、共有信念建立等动态博弈进程,利用泊松随机过程刻画治理失灵的情形,构建缔约方权威选择模型。认为在新形势下,金砖国家作为全球化的支撑群体需要通过转换自身的经验和新的观念,扮演"知识型权威"角色,积极发挥在全球气候治理中引领作用,从而促进全球气候治理体系向更为平衡的方向演化。Representing the emerging economies,BRICS are not only the participants to the global climate governance,but the anchor of stability to the process of globalization. While BRICS should be more active with the role of'the knowledge authority'to help the parties construct a new cognition,so as to lead the the parties of Paris agreement to fulfill the implementation of agreement and provide the BRICS power for the global climate governance. Based on the cognitive change of parties' climate governance and the establishment of common in the process of dynamic game,this paper uses the Poisson stochastic process to analyze the governance failure and build the parties' authoritative selection model.This paper considers that,as the globalization supporters in the new situation,BRICS need to spread their experiences and new ideas,act as the knowledge authority,and actively play a leading role in the global climate governance,aiming at making the evolution of global climate governance more balanced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

