检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学人文社会科学高等研究院,湖北武汉430079 [2]湖北师范大学政法学院,湖北黄石435000 [3]华中师范大学中国农村研究院,湖北武汉430079 [4]华中师范大学社会学院,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《城市发展研究》2017年第5期85-90,共6页Urban Development Studies
基 金:民政部2016年度全国农村基层治理创新理论研究课题"快速城镇化中转型社区的‘发展陷阱’与治理创新";教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"政府治理中的‘试点制’研究"(15YJC810024)
摘 要:城镇化是空间城镇化、制度城镇化与人的城镇化不断深化的过程。而资源介入状况的差异导致了转型社区的发展在上述三个层面面临不同的问题,转型社区本身也面临不同的发展陷阱。在资源匮乏的情况下,转型社区发展容易陷入碎片化和内卷化的陷阱。在资源介入充足的情况下,转型社区的发展也并不顺利。资本的介入导致转型社区容易陷入区隔化发展。发展陷阱则导致了转型社区居民无感发展、密集利益不能普惠、社区分化日益严重以及社会资本难以重塑等治理困境。The disparity in resource involvement has formed different developmental stages of transitional community, including the fragmentation stage of resource scarcity and the capitalization stage of resource involvement. Through the comparative analysis of the two transitional communities at different stages of development, it is found that resource intervention is mainly affected by its micro- transformation characteristics and macro-regional characteristics. At the same time, the transitional communities in the fragmented development stage faces the risk of involution traps, while the transitional communities in the capitalized development stage are at the risk of segmentation traps. The developmental traps of transitional community has led to a series of governance dilemmas: community residents have no sense of development, intensive interests can't be universal, community division is increasingly serious, and social capital is difficult to reshape, etc..
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222