检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鹿时刚
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2017年第12期1886-1888,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探讨脑干听觉诱发电位在前庭中枢性眩晕临床分类诊断中的作用。方法从本院2014年9月至2016年9月收治的前庭系统性眩晕患者中随机选择90例进行研究,设为观察组,并选择90例健康者设为对照组。对两组研究对象进行脑干听觉诱发电位检测,观察两组各波的分化情况,并进行比较。结果对照组波形均分化良好,观察组中有67例(74%)脑干听觉诱发电位异常,其中中枢性眩晕39例(58%)、周围性眩晕28例(42%)。两组的脑干听觉诱发电位结果进行比较,可得其Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ—Ⅴ波PL和Ⅱ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ—Ⅴ波IPL差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论利用脑干听觉诱发电位可以对前庭中枢性眩晕进行良好的临床分类诊断。Objective To explore the clinical value of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the clinical classification diagnosis of central vestibular system vertigo. Methods 90 patients with vestibular system vertigo in our hospital from September 2014 to September 2016 were selected as the observation group, and 90 healthy people were selected as the control group. The subjects of two groups were detected by brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and observed the differentiation of the two groups. Results The waveform of the control group was well differentiated; there were 67 cases (74%) of abnormal brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the observation group, including 39 cases (58%) of central vertigo and 28 cases (42%) of peripheral vertigo. There were statistically significant differences in the results of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (PL and IPL of I - III , III- V , I - V waveform) between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion Brainstem auditory evoked potentials has good clinical value in the clinical classification diagnosis of central vestibular system vertigo.
关 键 词:脑干听觉诱发电位 前庭系统性眩晕 中枢性眩晕 周围性眩晕 诊断
分 类 号:R764.3[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.109.97