检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑晓岩[1]
机构地区:[1]济南市中心医院内分泌科,山东济南250013
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2017年第5期7-8,共2页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的分析研究高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹技术的护理及改进。方法随机选取该院2016年10月-2017年1月期间收治的60例代谢综合征(MS)患者,按照入院顺序,分为实验组与常规组,各30例。所有患者,均行高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹试验,其中,常规组,行常规护理,实验组,实施经改进的护理方式,对比分析护理效果。结果对比不良反应,实验组发生率为3.3%,常规组为16.7%,实验组显著低于常规组(P<0.05)。对比护理满意度,实验组显著高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹试验中,采用经改进的护理方式,效果显著,值得推广。Objective To analyze the nursing and improvement of hyperinsulinism- hyperinsulinemie-euglycemic clamp. Methods 60 cases of patients with metabolism syndrome admitted and treated in our hospital from October 2016 to January 2017 were randomly selected and divided into two groups with 30 cases in each according to the admission order, and all patients were treated with hyperinsulinism-hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, and the routine group adopted the routine nursing, while the experimental group adopted the improved nursing method, and the nursing effect was compared and ana- lyzed. Results The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the experimental group was obviously lower than that in the rou- tine group(3.3% vs 16.7%)(P〈0.05), and the nursing satisfactory degree in the experimental group was obviously higher than that in the routine group(P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of the improved nursing method in the hyperinsulinism-hyperinsu- linemie-euglycemic clamp is obvious, which is worth promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15