检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢媛媛[1]
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2017年第5期20-21,共2页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的研究连续护理对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的干预效果。方法以2014年3月-2016年2月间该院接诊的112例妊娠期糖尿病患者为研究对象,按照患者自愿选择的护理方式对其进行分组:研究组56例采用连续护理方案,对照组56例采用常规护理方案。观察两组血糖水平的变化情况,比较妊娠结局等指标。结果研究组干预后的FBG水平为(5.94±1.46)mmol/L、2 hPG水平为(6.94±0.37)mmol/L,明显比对照组的(9.23±1.48)、(10.23±0.45)mmol/L低,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组的妊娠结局明显优于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论于妊娠期糖尿病中积极引入连续护理理念,可显著改善患者的妊娠结局,提高血糖控制的效果。Objective To research the continuous nursing on the intervention effect of pregnancy outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods 112 cases of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus admitted and treated in our hospital from March 2014 to February 2016 were selected and divided into two groups with 56 cases in each according to the volunteer methods, the research group adopted the continuous nursing plan, while the control group adopted the routine nursing plan, and the blood glucose level changes of the two groups was observed and the pregnancy outcomes were com- pared between the two groups. Results After intervention, the FBG level and 2 hPG level in the research group were obvi- ously lower than those in the control group, [(5.94±1.46),(6.94±0.37)mmol/L vs (9.23±1.48),(10.23+0.45)mmol/L], and the differences between groups were obvious (P〈0.05), and the pregnancy outcome in the research group was obviously better than that in the control group, and the difference between groups was obvious (P〈0.05). Conclusion The positive introduc- tion of continuous nursing idea in gestational diabetes mellitus can obviously improve the pregnancy outcome and improve the blood glucose control effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3