检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江国华[1] 张彬[1] JIANG Guo-hua ZHANG Bin(School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Chin)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第3期26-31,共6页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:检察机关提起民事公益诉讼之法理问题,本质上就是检察机关提起民事诉讼之正当性问题。其所涉及的核心命题是检察机关充当民事公益诉讼控诉方的缘由,以及公益性民事侵权需要由检察机关提起诉讼的理由。对此,可从公益代理人理论、公诉权理论、积极诉讼理论和社会正义理论四个层面作出系统阐述。其中,前两者分别从"谁是公共利益的代表人"和"如何实现公共利益之救济"等角度解答了检察机关提起民事公益诉讼之可能性问题;而后两者则从"谁会为公共利益积极诉讼"和"如何有效实现社会正义"等角度解决了检察机关提起民事公益诉讼之必要性问题。The theoretical basis of the Procuratorial Organs Initiating Civil Public Interest Litigation is an essentially legitimacy problem. The core propositions of which are that grounds for the procuratorial organs act as plaintiffs in civil litigation of public interest, and reasons for we need the procuratorial organs to litigate in public welfare civil tort. To these questions, we can make a system describe by four theories, that are Public Service Agents theory, Indictment Right theory, Positive Action theory and The Theory of Social Justice. A- mong them, the first two theories explained the feasibility problems of the Procuratorial Organs Initiating Civil Public Interest Litigation form the "who is the representative of the public interest" and "how to achieve relief of the public interest" and some other standpoint; and the latter two theories solved the necessity problems from the "who will be active for public interest" and "how to achieve social justice" and some other stand- point.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171