检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱兰兰[1] 蔡银莺[1] ZHU Lan-lan CAI Yin-ying(College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Chin)
出 处:《自然资源学报》2017年第5期727-741,共15页Journal of Natural Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41371519;71573099)~~
摘 要:论文以国内率先试点探索农田保护经济补偿政策的创新实践地区——成都和苏州为典型实证,基于2012和2015年两期农户动态跟踪调研数据,运用DID模型测量农田保护经济补偿政策实施异质效应及影响因素。结果表明:1)农田保护经济补偿政策的持续实施显著增加实践地区农民的政策满意度,激励农民参与农地流转,但对提升农民参与农田保护性耕作措施的作用较小。2)农田保护经济补偿政策实施成效具有显著异质性。2008年开始试点养老保障与农业补偿相结合的耕地保护基金政策的成都市,农户政策满意度的上升幅度相对较大。乡镇经济发达、长三角地区经济发展带重镇的苏州市,农户家庭生计多元,户均非农业收入占比达82.12%,较成都农户高2.66%,农地生计依赖较弱,补偿政策明显促进该区域农户参与农地流转,但农户农田保护积极性值却大幅下降。3)受访者的年龄、受教育水平、农田保护及功能认知、对农田保护政策关注程度、农业收入占比、家庭劳动力比例、调研村庄经济水平及受访村庄与最近城镇距离均会显著影响农田保护经济补偿政策实施成效。Chengdu and Suzhou are cities taking the lead in implementing the policy of economiccompensation policy for farmland conservation. Taking Chengdu and Suzhou as examples, weuse difference-in-difference (DID) estimators to measure the effects and influencing factors of thepolicy based on a tracking survey conducted in 2012 and 2015. The results are: firstly, thecontinuous implementation of the policy greatly improved farmers' satisfaction and encouragedfarmers to participate in land transfer, which helped realizing large-scale management of landoperation but impeded farmers' enthusiasm for protecting farmland and engaging in agriculturalproduction. Secondly, there existed significantly regional differences in the implementationeffects due to the disparities of economic development level and period of the policyimplementation among regions. Specifically, Chengdu started the compensation policy first, andcombined it with agricultural subsidies and pension security, so the policy gradually made someachievements. Meanwhile, farmers in Suzhou, one of the most developed areas in China wherethere are diverse livelihoods and high non-agricultural incomes, were highly encouraged toparticipate in land transfer instead of farmland protection and farm works. Finally, the effects ofthe policy implementation were significantly affected by the age, education, cognition offarmland function and conservation, attention to policy of farmland conservation of the farmers,labor forces and annual income from agriculture of the household, and the village' s economiccondition and the distance to the nearest town.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.100.204