检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘颖[1] 张鹏[1] 张利远[1] LIU Ying ZHANG Peng ZHANG Li-yuan(Department of Emergency, Nantong First people's Hospital, Nantong, 226001 China)
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2017年第5期418-419,共2页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
基 金:南通市科技计划项目“优化农村急救医疗服务体系及推广适宜急救技术应用研究”(MS22015001)
摘 要:目的了解农村医疗机构适宜急救技术的项目需求和培训需求,为适宜急救技术的科学筛选、有效推广提供参考依据。方法采用典型抽样的方法,于2015年6月-2016年5月对南通地区二级及二级以下的医院380名从事基层医疗工作的医生进行问卷调查。结果92.36%(351/380)的调查对象赞成适宜急救技术在本地区推广,90.26%(343/380)的调查对象非常愿意或愿意掌握新的适宜急救技术;55.54%的调查对象首选“现场心肺复苏术”作为在农村推广的适宜急救技术;调查对象的培训需求较强。结论农村适宜急救技术的科学筛选是保证其推广应用的基础,适宜性是筛选适宜急救技术的要点。Objective To explore the requirement of feasible emergency technique and technology and among rural medical institutions, to provide reference for scientific and effective popularization and application feasible emergency technique and technology, we began our study. Methods Totally380 doctors working in medical institutions were interviewed face-to-face using typical sampling method in rural area of Nantong. Results For all respondents, 92.36% expected feasible emergency technology to be applicated in local area and 90.26% liked to grasp the new technique and technology. The cardio-pulmonary resuscitation were prefered by 55.54% of the respondents. Conclusion Scientific screening feasible technique and technology is necessary for popularization and application them in rural area
分 类 号:R197.62[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28