“开明派”研究综述  

A Summary of the Study of“Liberal School”

作　　者：赵普光[1] 方久月 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学文学院

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期92-99,116,共9页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"现代中国书话史研究"(10CZW063)

摘　　要：目前关于"开明派"的研究主要包括"开明派"命名合法性研究、载体研究、开明同人研究和流派内外部关系研究等。现有文献虽为后来者研究"开明派"提供了较为丰富的参考,但既往研究过分侧重于其合法性,忽视了"开明派"作为文学流派的独立性和整体性的研究,亦未对相关文学出版实践活动研究给予足够重视。一些研究者由于与"开明派"最初聚集地具有"同乡同城"的关系,便纷纷"抱团"为"本乡本城"进行合法性阐释,暴露出文学流派研究视野狭窄的问题。从文学流派的研究视角对"开明派"的研究现状进行梳理和评述,当会为"开明派"这一课题的深入研究提供帮助。The current research on liberal school” mainly involves liberal naming legitimacy？ carrier of lit-erary genre, liberal collaborators and relationship between internal and external school. The existingliterature provides rich references for the later study, but places too much emphasis on its legitimacy whileignores its independence and integrity as a literary school and lacks attention to its publication. Many re-searchers coming from Jiangsu and Zhejiang province ^cluster” to interpret ^native village and city, s legiti-macy because their hometowns are located in the same areas as the original home to liberal school”, which exposes the narrow research horizon of literary genre study. The combing and review of search from the perspective of literary genre will be helpful for the further study of“liberal school”.

关 键 词：文学流派 “开明派” 合法性 文学出版 开明同人 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]