检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱思萍[1]
出 处:《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第4期56-61,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:2014年福建师范大学青年教师成才基金项目(人文社科类)资助(VY-1416);2015年福建省教育厅科研项目资助(JAS150200)
摘 要:为解决不动产信托登记有名无实的尴尬问题和房地产投资信托基金登记的法律瓶颈,通过对不动产信托登记与不动产物权登记进行文献分析,发现两大法系对信托财产权属的立法存在巨大差异,提出借鉴中国台湾地区的相关立法,在不动产物权登记的基础上,对不动产信托登记的效力、主体、事项提出相关立法建议,对房地产投资信托基金登记提出适当进行技术性调适的建议。A huge difference between the two legal systems is found in the trust property ownership legislation through the analysis of the similarities and differences in the registration of the real estate trust registration and real estate registration to solve the nominal awkward problem of real estate trust registration and solve the legal bottleneck problem of REITs in registration . It is necessary to draw on the relevant legislation in Taiwan, on the basis of the real property registration,the legislative proposals on the effectiveness of the registration,the subject, the registered items and the registration of real estate investment trust,the technical adjustment to the real estate investment trusts registration are put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229