日本法医司法解剖实例分析  

Insight of Japan's Judicial Autopsy Procedure from a Concrete Case

作　　者：罗良鸣[1] 孙振文[2] 崔冠峰[2] 霍塞虎[3] 任文彦[4] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省温州市公安局刑事科学技术研究所,浙江温州325000 [2]公安部物证鉴定中心,北京100038 [3]浙江警察学院刑事技术系,杭州310053 [4]浙江省公安厅物证鉴定中心,杭州310009

出　　处：《刑事技术》2017年第3期250-252,共3页Forensic Science and Technology

基　　金：中国工程院咨询研究项目(No.2016-XZ-12-04)

摘　　要：各国的法医体制因法律体系的不同而存在差异。日本的法医制度来源于德国模式,部分吸收了美国模式,又根据自身的特点发展了检视官和司法检视制度,同时,与法医学相关的法律制度完善、监督机制强大,虽不可避免偶有错案发生,仍不可否认日本法医制度的完善性和独特性。根据死亡性质的不同,日本的法医解剖主要有司法解剖、行政解剖、承诺解剖三类。本文通过一例司法解剖实例对日本司法解剖的委托、实施、出具鉴定文书等流程进行了详细介绍,旨在为我国广大同行提供借鉴与参考。Each country has its own institution of forensic medicine in compliance to the relevant legal system. Mainly originated from that of Germany, Japan5s institution of forensic medicine （or legal medicine） has also partly assimilated the one of US, having gradually developed its examiner officers and judicial autopsy procedure that is typical of Japanese distinct features. With strong surveillance mechanism, the comparatively consummate legal institutions relating to forensic medicine secure Japan？s legal medicine institution to become perfect and unique regardless of occasional occurrence of misjudged cases. According to the death manner, there are three kinds of forensic autopsy in Japan： the judicial, administrative and consent. From one concrete case in this article, a detailed introduction was put up about Japan？s judicial autopsy procedure of authorization, autopsy,issuance of expertise report and the others related,aiming to provide a reference for our Chinese peers and colleagues.

关 键 词：法医病理 日本法医司法解剖 

分 类 号：DF795.1[医药卫生—法医学]