《哈姆莱特》之“延宕”争鸣探析  

On the Debates about the “Procrastination” in Hamlet

作　　者：胡银萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学文学与新闻学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湖南广播电视大学学报》2017年第2期24-29,共6页Journal of Hunan Radio and Television University

摘　　要：关于"延宕"的争议有两种观点,一是不存在延宕,二是存在延宕且关于其根源有不同意见。关于不存在延宕的观点主要是对哈姆莱特人物本身的误读。关于"延宕"存在且主要有三类争鸣:一是自身与社会论;二是精神分析相关论;三是宗教论。本文结合阅读体验,辨析了历史上关于"延宕"争鸣的各家观点。There are two major parts of the arguments about “ Hamlet ’ s Hesitation”. Some scholars deny it. While most scholars claim that “Hamlet’s Hesitation” actually existed,and have different opinions about the origin of “Hamlet’ Hesitation”. Generally speak-ing, there are three sorts of viewpoints about the existence of “Hamlet’ s Hesitation”,the theory of era, the theory of Oedipus complex, and the theory of religion. This paper explores various arguments about “ Hamlet ’ s Hesitation” so as to enrich the study of Hamlet.

关 键 词：《哈姆莱特》 延宕 莎士比亚 争鸣 

分 类 号：TU-021[建筑科学—建筑理论]