检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田冠浩[1]
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学马克思主义学部,吉林长春130024
出 处:《中共中央党校学报》2017年第3期29-35,共7页Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.T.C
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目"马克思主义政治哲学重大基础理论问题研究"(15ZDB002);国家社会科学基金青年项目"马克思与卢梭的理论传承关系研究"(13CZX004);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金(1609104)
摘 要:虽然面临着来自现当代哲学的批评与挑战,但启蒙思想作为包含多重路径的整体,仍然以其深刻的复杂性和内在张力,构成了理解现代文明并在根本问题上对现代文明作出决断的前提。启蒙思想为回答所有重大政治哲学问题找到了一个新起点:个人自由。这一起点同时带来机遇和危机。直到黑格尔和马克思找到了自由的整全性和个人的自我实现这个根本目的,启蒙才有可能收拾自己的遗产,完成对自身多重路径的综合,从而将自身重建为一种具有深刻性和高贵品质的新文明。Although facing criticisms and challenges from modern philosophy, the thought of enlightenment as a multi-path whole, still forms the prerequisite for understanding modern civilization and making decisions on the fundamental issues with its profound complexity and internal tension. The enlightenment thought found a new starting point for answering all major questions in political philosophy: the individual liberty. But this starting point brings with it both opportunities and challenges. Not until Hegel and Marx found the fundamental purposes that were the integrity of freedom and individual self-realization (integrated development), did enlightenment pick up its heritage and accomplish the multi-path combination, so as to rebuild a new civilization itself with profundity and noble quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13