检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安晓东[1] 靖金莲[1] 刘玲玲[1] 阎翠萍[1] 郑秦平[1] 李世平[1] 黄丽波
机构地区:[1]山西省农业科学院小麦研究所,山西临汾041000 [2]襄汾县农业局,山西襄汾041500
出 处:《山西农业科学》2017年第6期909-911,956,共4页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences
基 金:山西省农业科学院博士基金项目(YGG1421)
摘 要:为了探究小麦耐热性不同鉴定方法鉴定结果的一致性和不同鉴定方法的优缺点,2015—2016年度用日光温室增温耐热性鉴定、隔期播种耐热性鉴定及细胞膜热稳定性鉴定3种方法对34份小麦品种试验材料进行鉴定比较。结果表明,从总体鉴定结果来看,这3种鉴定方法的鉴定结果间有较好的一致性,用任一方法鉴定结果都可对品种耐热性有一个准确的了解,但如果要详细了解一个品种的耐热性情况,最好采用多年多点多鉴定方法进行耐热性鉴定。To explore the consistency of the identification results of wheat different heat resistance and the the advantages and disadvantages of different between different identification methods, 34 wheat varieties were used as experimental material for comparing these three methods of heat resistant identification by sowing at different times, thermal environment in greenhouse and cell membrane thermostability in 2016. The results showed that from the overall the three identification methods of appraisal results had good consistency between each other, and any appraisal result could be a knowledge to the heat resistant of varieties. If more about a variety for heat resistance want to be learned, it is better to identificating a variety for heat resistant by more years, more site and more methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3