差异与共融中的全球正义--兼论阿玛蒂亚·森对亨廷顿“文明冲突论”的批评  

Global Justice in Difference and Communion—on Amartya Sen's Criticism of Huntington's Theory of Civilization Clash

作　　者：李翔[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学马克思主义学院,河南新乡453007

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2017年第3期27-32,100,共7页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学项目“马克思分配正义思想及其当代境遇研究”(15YJC70028)

摘　　要：随着全球化的日益延展,我们面临着愈来愈多的正义挑战,此起彼伏的冲突就是一个重要的表现。诱发冲突的因素纷繁复杂,但决非是人类现存的不同文明所引致。文明冲突论不是一种新范式,而是一种旧思维,是一种固有的文化霸权,其根源在于以禁闭的文明来确认身份的认同。尊重身份的多元,秉持选择的自由,坚持理性的优先,才能走出身份的幻象与迷雾。超越自我利益的观念束缚,促进不同文化之间的对话沟通,在差异与共融的基础上,全球正义才可以实现。With the growing trend of globalization, we have been increasingly confronted with justice challenges, and the constant conflicts are a prime symptom. Conflicts are induced by complicated causes, but are by no means caused by existing human civilizations. The theory of civilization clash is not a new paradigm but an old way of thinking, and it is an inherent cultural hegemony rooted in the identity confirmation with confined cultures. Only when we respect diverse identities, uphold the freedom of choice, and practice rationality first can we find a way out of the murky illusion of identity. Global justice can only be achieved if we break？the？shackle？of self interest, promote communication among civilizations, embrace differences and share the world in harmony.

关 键 词：文明冲突 文化霸权 幻象 全球正义 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系] G04[政治法律—政治学]