标准必要专利卷入反垄断案件的原因  

Reasons for the Involvement of Standard Essential Patents in Anti-monopoly Cases

作　　者：王晓晔[1] 丁亚琦[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第6期84-90,共7页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"垄断认定过程中的相关市场边界划分原则与技术研究"(项目编号:12&2D200)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：标准必要专利作为技术标准与专利相结合的产物,与一般专利相比有其明显的特点。这不仅表现为标准必要专利与社会公共利益有着更为紧密的联系,而且由于必要专利对标准实施人或者潜在被许可人具有不可替代性,标准必要专利权人可能凭借其在专利许可市场的支配地位实施专利劫持,比如收取过高的专利许可费,或者滥用禁令请求权。标准必要专利权人易于产生排除、限制竞争的问题,从而较一般专利权人会更多地卷入反垄断私人诉讼,或者遭遇反垄断执法机构的调查。Standard essential patents （SEPs）, the combination of the technical standards and patents, have distinct characteristics in comparison with the ordinary patents. It manifests that SEPs are not only closely and connected with social and public interests, but also due to the irreplaceability to standard implementers or potential licensees, SEPs holders may abuse the dom- inant market position to engage in patent holdup in licensing market, such as charging an exces- sive license royalty or abusing the right of injunctive relief. SEPs holders are inclined to result in the issue of eliminating and restricting competition, therefore, they are more potentially involved in anti - monopoly private litigation in contrast to ordinary patentees, or suffer the investigation of Administrative Enforcement Agency of the Anti -monopoly Law.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 社会公共利益 专利许可费 禁令救济 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]