国际商事仲裁司法审查案件内部请示报告制度的转型  

Transformation of Internal Reporting System in Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitration in China

作　　者：朱科[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第6期126-131,共6页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：我国法院审查国际商事仲裁案件的内部请示报告制度发挥了积极作用,但也存在违反审级独立原则、不符合诉讼原理、与司法改革方向相悖等缺陷,故有必要对该制度进行改革和转型。应设立有限上诉制度,制度内容包括:设置上诉程序、不设再审程序;上诉只限于一审法院对仲裁拟作出否定性裁定的案件;审查的范围仅限于上诉人提出上诉且法律有规定的事由;审查程序参照民事诉讼的二审程序。为保证上诉审案件的质量,还需要采取加强裁判文书说理、推进裁判文书公开、深化司法责任制改革、最高人民法院加强监督指导等措施。The internal reporting system has played a positive role in judicial review of international commercial arbitration in China, but it also has defects such as violating the judicial in- dependence, inconsistent with the litigation principle, and contrary to the direction of judicial re- form. It is necessary to transform the internal reporting system to a permitted appellate system. No retrial procedures is allowed. The scope of appeal should be limited to courtg decisions which arbitration agreements are presumed invalid and the court refuses the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards or set aside the awards. Court＂ review should be limited to the exhaustive grounds regulated in the arbitration law and may apply to appellate procedure. In order to ensure the quality of the appeal cases, we must also take measures to strengthen the reasoning of judgments, promote the open judice, deepen the judicial reform, and strengthen the supervision and guidance of the Supreme People＇s Court.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 司法审查 内部请示制度 有限上诉制度 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]