检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2017年第7期1355-1356,共2页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨预见性护理在榷体压缩性骨折手术患者中的应用价值及对并发症防治的临床意义。方法椎体压缩性骨折手术患者76例随机分为两组,各38例。对照组予以常规护理干预,观察组在常规护理基础上给予预见性护理干预,比较两组患者并发症发生率、手术基本情况及护理满意度。结果观察组并发症发生率为5.3%,对照组为18.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组平均住院天数低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);观察组护理满意率97.3%,对照组78.9%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论开展预见性护理有利于降低并发症的发生,提高护理满意度,减少病患住院时间,加快患者康复,值得推广应用。Objective To analyze the application value of predictive nursing in patients with vertebral compression fracture and the clinical significance of prevention and treatment of complications. Methods 76 cases of vertebral compression fracture from January 2009 to June 2015 were selected with a random number table method and randomly divided into two groups, the control group ( 38 cases ) was given routine nursing, the observation group of 38 cases in routine care based on given predictive nursing intervention. The complications occurred, surgery and nursing satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. Results In observation group, the complication rate was 5.3% and control group was 18.4%, the difference between the two groups was significant ( P〈0.05 ) . In observation group, the average days of hospitalization was lower than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was significant ( P〈0.01 ) ; observation group care satisfaction rate was 97.3% and 78.9% in the control group, the difference between the two groups was significant ( P〈0.05 ) . Conclusion Foresee nursing is conducive to reducing complications, improving nursing satisfaction, reducing patient hospitalization time , promoting the rapid rehabilitation ofpatients, is worthy ofpopularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43