二元模式:违法所得没收程序的走向  

Binary Model:The Direction of the Confiscation of Illegal Procedures

作　　者：孙明泽[1] SUN Ming-ze(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120 , China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期89-94,共6页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12XFX015);重庆市法学会研究课题(社科联委托课题)(2016FXZX09);西南政法大学学生科研创新项目博士生项目(2016XZXS-002);内蒙古科技大学2016年科研创新基金项目(2016QDW-S06)

摘　　要：违法所得没收程序的性质是2012年我国修改刑事诉讼法前后热烈讨论的问题,对该问题的研究能够保障我国违法所得没收程序的良好运转。国外对该程序有多重立法模式:刑事诉讼模式、民事诉讼模式、保安处分模式以及单独立法模式。在我国,也主要存在刑事诉讼说、民事诉讼说与保安处分说三种学说。违法所得没收程序不应当单纯地理解为刑事诉讼程序或者民事诉讼程序,我们应当用发展的眼光看待该程序。当前阶段,我国的违法所得没收程序应当具有刑事诉讼的性质,但是在未来,违法所得没收程序必将走向民事诉讼程序。The nature of the illegal confiscation procedure is a hot discussion before and after the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012. The study of this problem can guarantee the good operation of the illegal collection procedure. There are multiple legislative models in foreign countries ： criminal action mode, civil action mode, security mode and separate legislative model. In our country, there are also mainly criminal proceedings, civil litigation and security matters which are said to be three doctrines. The procedure for the confiscation of offenses should not be simply understood as criminal proceedings or civil proceedings, and we should look at the procedure in a developmental way. At present, China ’ s illegal confiscation procedures should have the nature of criminal proceedings, but in the future, illegal confiscation procedures will go to civil proceedings.

关 键 词：违法所得没收程序 刑事诉讼 民事诉讼 保安处分 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]