检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏良玉[1] 李世齐 鲁坤[2] 罗东坤[1] 刘键烨 代由进 翟雨阳[4]
机构地区:[1]中国石油大学(北京)工商管理学院,北京102249 [2]中国石油天然气集团公司中俄项目部,北京100007 [3]中石油煤层气有限责任公司,北京100028 [4]中联煤层气国家工程研究中心有限责任公司,北京100095
出 处:《工业技术经济》2017年第7期27-34,共8页Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基 金:"十三五"国家科技重大专项"大型油气田及煤层气开发"下设子课题:煤层气开发经济评价与风险评估(项目编号:2016ZX05042-002-004);中国石油大学(北京)科研基金资助:基于经济评价的非常规天然气产业政策研究(项目编号:2462015YQ0718)
摘 要:在评价煤层气开发项目经济效益的过程中,常采用敏感性分析来评估项目的不确定性,但敏感性分析无法综合评估项目的不确定性。本文开展此项研究以期建立简便、可操作的综合不确定性分析方法。为此,利用模拟方案生成数据,对数据进行统计分析,寻找不确定因素与效益指标之间的函数关系。研究发现,当不确定因素在一定范围内波动时,多因素变动对经济效益的综合影响可以近似为单因素影响的线性叠加,即可利用单因素敏感曲线的拟合斜率来构建综合评价公式。线性叠加会产生计算误差,误差随因素变动范围的扩大而增加,不确定因素在±25%范围内波动时,90%以上的数据落在误差区间为±10%的范围之内。文中建立的方法可以对方案进行综合不确定性评价,优选方案。The sensitivity analysis is a common method for uncertainty evaluation of the coal-bed methane(CBM) development projects,but unfortunately can not have a comprehensive evaluation for uncertainty of the project. Therefore,it is necessary to construct a simple and operational comprehensive evaluation method of uncertain factors. Firstly,the CBM development scheme is constructed and the profit data of various uncertain factors are simulated. Then the statistical analysis of the data is carried out. Finally the function relationship between the factors and the profit is found. It is shown that the combined effect of multivariate changes on economic benefits can be approximated as a linear superposition of the univariate effect when uncertain factors fluctuate in a certain range,which is the comprehensive evaluation formula of uncertainty can be constructed by using the fitting slope of the univariate sensitivity curve. Simulation deviation of the method tends to increase with the expansion of the sensitive factors variation. More than 90% of the data deviation can be controlled within 10% when uncertain factors fluctuate within 25%. The method established in this paper can be applied to comprehensive evaluation of uncertainty and provide reference for the comparison among different scheme within an allowable deviation and credibility range.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145