检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省杭州市萧山区第一人民医院,311200
出 处:《中国计划生育学杂志》2017年第6期380-383,共4页Chinese Journal of Family Planning
摘 要:目的:探讨妊娠合并慢性心力衰竭孕妇心肌损伤标志物水平及心功能参数指标变化的临床意义。方法:选取2010年1月-2016年12月本院收治的妊娠合并慢性心力衰竭孕妇36例为已孕心衰组,选取医院就诊的未孕慢性心力衰竭患者42例(未孕心衰组)和正常妊娠妇女50例(正常妊娠组),同期医院体检正常的健康女性50例(正常对照组)。测定4组妇女心肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、N端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平;彩色多普勒超声诊断仪测定舒张压早期左室充盈峰速度(E)、心房收缩期左室充盈峰速度(A),计算E/A值、左室射血分数(LVEF)、每搏心输出量(SV)、心输出量(CO)、左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)。结果:cTnI、NT-proBNP测定水平已孕心衰组>未孕心衰组>正常妊娠组>正常对照组(P<0.05)。已孕心衰组E峰流速、A峰流速、E/A、LVEF、SV、CO均低于另外3组,LVEDV、LVESV高于另外(P<0.05);未孕心衰组上述指标也分别低于或高于正常妊娠组、正常对照组(P<0.05);正常妊娠组LVEDV、LVESV高于正常对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与未孕心衰女性相比,妊娠合并慢性心衰孕妇的心肌损伤标志物发生异常,心肌收缩、舒张功能进一步下降,在产科临床应引起注意予以检测和观察。Objective: To investigate clinical value of the change of serum cardiac markers and cardiac function parame- ters of pregnant women with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods: A total of 36 pregnant women with CHF in The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District from January 2010 to December 2016 were selected into CHF group, 42 non-pregnant patients with CHF were in non-pregnant CHF group, 50 normal pregnant women were in normal preg- nancy group, and 50 healthy women for physical examination in the same period were in normal control group. Level of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) of women in the four groups were detected. And early diastolic left ventricular filling peak velocity (E), atrial systolic left ventricular filling peak velocity (A), E/A, left ventrieular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) of women in the four groups were meas- ured by color Doppler ultrasound. Results: Level of cTnI and NT-proBNP of women in pregnant CHF group were sig- nificantly higher than those of women in non-pregnant CHF group, normal pregnancy group and normal control group (P〈 0.05). The peak E velocity, peak A velocity, E/A, LVEF, SV and CO of women in pregnant CHF group were significantly lower than those of women in the other three groups, but LVEDV and LVESV of women in non-pregnant CHF group were significant higher (P〈 0.05). The peak E velocity, peak A velocity, E/A, LVEF, SV and CO of women in non-pregnant CHF group were significantly lower than those of women in normal pregnancy group and nor mal control group, but LVEDV and LVESV of women in non-pregnant CHF group were significant higher (P 〈0.05). LVEDV and LVESV of women in normal pregnancy group were significant higher those of women in normal control group (P〈 0.05). Conclusion: Compared to non-pregnant women with
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28