中国设计产业钻石模型的双结构方程检验  

A test of the dual structure equation of the diamond model in the Chinese design industry

作　　者：陈圻[1] 王汉友[1,2] 陈国栋[3] 周海海[4] 辛永容[5] 吴讯[4] 

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京210016 [2]广东五邑大学艺术设计学院,广东江门529020 [3]浙江台州学院,浙江台州317000 [4]南京航空航天大学机电工程学院,江苏南京210016 [5]江苏开放大学,江苏南京210036

出　　处：《科研管理》2017年第6期67-75,共9页Science Research Management

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JA630038);国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目(11AGL001);五邑大学青年科研基金一般项目社会科学A类(2014SK06)

摘　　要：运用"双结构方程"新方法,就中国设计产业来验证M E.Porter钻石模型理论框架,以及各因子之间相互影响。运用基于设计产业现实表现评价和基于对设计产业的重要性评价的李克特量表数据,分别构建两个耦合的结构方程模型并比较其结果。研究表明:显示设计产业不存在要素驱动和投资驱动;本文双钻石模型模型中Porter四个决定因子之间存在显著相互作用,在基于重要性评价的模型中相关更为显著;Porter钻石模型能够解释中国设计产业竞争优势,基于重要性评价模型不支持政府作用是设计产业钻石模型的一个决定因子,但Porter的钻石模型的4个决定因子加上政府作用可以解释中国设计产业竞争优势的现实表现。本文证明政府的直接作用从长期来看并不能增强一个产业的竞争优势,设计产业在这一点上与其他产业并无不同。This paper verifies the theoretical framework of M. E. Porter＇ s diamond model of the Chinese design industry and the interactions of the influence factors by applying the＂ dual structure equation＂ method and construct two coupling structure equations respectively by use of the Likert Scale data for the actual performance evaluation and the importance evaluation of the Chinese design industry. The analysis reveals that there is no factor - driving or investment - driving in the design industry, that there is a significant interaction among the 4 factors of Porter＇ s diamond model, which can explain design industry＇ s competitive advantage, and that the government is not supported as one of the determinant factors of the diamond model, but the factors and the government role can explain the actual performance of the Chinese design industry. The results reveal that direct government effect cannot enhance the competitive advantage of the industry in the long term, and the design industry is not different from oth- ers at this point.

关 键 词：钻石模型 结构方程 竞争优势 设计产业 政府作用 

分 类 号：F12[经济管理—世界经济]