我国作品独创性认定的实证研究  

Empirical Study on Cognizance of Originality in China

作　　者：唐先博 黄明健[1] 李萍[2] 

机构地区：[1]澳门科技大学法学院,澳门999078 [2]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期151-160,共10页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：独创性是获取著作权的必要条件,但现行法律对独创性的概念、认定标准与认定原则等都未做规定。从2012年至2014年关于独创性认定的28起案件看,认定独创性的司法标准有四种:是否表达出作者的个性;是否为自主意识下的选择、组织、加工等;是否影响公有领域;是否具有新颖性。司法标准高低不同,导致判决差异较大。为规范独创性的司法认定,应当以社会标准原则、整体性原则、区分原则与公共政策原则作为独创性认定的基本原则,同时还要明确创造性的准入门槛。Originality is prerequisite for works. But the notion of originality, standard of originality and ascertainment principle of originality are not provided in law. Form 28 cases about cognizance of originality form 2012 to 2014, there are four kinds of judicial standard of originality ： whether the work conveys the author＇ s personality ; whether the work is the result of author＇s choice, arrangement and design; whether the work would affect the public domain; whether the work is novel- ty. Due to different kinds of judicial standard, even in the same kind of works, court decisions about originality are so dif- ferent. To regulate judicial cognizance of originality, basic principles of cognizance of originality and admittance threshold of creativity must be deemed.

关 键 词：作品 独创性 创造性 司法标准 认定原则 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]