检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘娇[1] 刘敬敏[1] 余波[1] 杨绿峰[1,2]
机构地区:[1]广西大学土木建筑工程学院工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西南宁530004 [2]广西壮族自治区住房和城乡建设厅,广西南宁530028
出 处:《工程力学》2017年第B06期31-37,共7页Engineering Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51478125);广西自然科学基金重大项目(2012GXNSFEA053002);广西高校科学技术研究项目(2013YB009);广西优秀博士学位论文培育项目(YCBZ2012009)
摘 要:主要失效模式的识别是结构体系可靠度分析的难点和关键。该文首先综述了主要失效模式识别的国内外研究现状及存在的缺陷;然后针对传统失效模式识别方法主要依靠工程经验确定约界阈值、难以兼顾计算效率和计算精度的问题,介绍了一种结构体系可靠度分析的自适应动态约界法;同时,针对传统失效模式识别方法的路径依赖性所带来的计算量大、识别效率不高等缺陷,介绍了一种结构体系可靠度分析的无路径依赖性方法;最后通过算例分析,验证了这两种方法的有效性和适用性。Identification of dominant failure modes is one of the most critical problems for structural system reliability analysis. In this paper, the recent research progress and existing disadvantages for traditional methods for identification of dominant failure modes is reviewed first. To overcome the disadvantages of traditional approaches for identification of dominant failure modes in which the computational efficiency and accuracy cannot always be guaranteed due to the fact that the bounding thresholds are determined by engineering experience, an adaptive dynamic bounding method for structural system analysis is proposed. Meanwhile, to overcome the disadvantages of the traditional methods of high computational cost and low efficiency due to the behavior of failure path dependency, a failure path-independent method is presented for structural system reliability analysis. The efficiency and applicability of the proposed methods are verified through two numerical examples.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.39