检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾子霞[1]
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2017年第12期241-242,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的研究分析急性脑出血患者接受急诊护理路径的临床效果。方法选取2013年10月—2015年10月我院的124例急性脑出血患者来分析研究,将患者分组为对照组和观察组,对照组患者接受常规护理,观察组患者接受临床护理路径护理,对两组的临床护理效果进行比较分析。结果观察组的临床护理满意度是96.77%,对照组的临床护理满意度是83.87%,两组护理满意度对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组患者的抢救死亡率是11.29%,观察组的抢救死亡率是3.23%,两组抢救死亡率对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性脑出血患者临床中接受急诊护理路径护理能够降低患者的死亡率,提升临床护理满意度,安全可靠。Objective To study and analyze the clinical effect of emergency nursing pathway for patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. Methods A total of 124 cases of patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage in our hospital from October 2013 October 2015 were studied. The patients were divided into control group and observation group, control group was given routine nursing care, observation group was given clinical nursing pathway, the clinical nursing effect of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The clinical nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 96.77%, and the clinical nursing satisfaction of the control group was 83.87%. The difference between the two groups in nursing satisfaction was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The rescue death rate of the control group was 11.29%, the rescue death rate in observation group was 3.23%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Emergency nursing pathway nursing in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage can reduce the mortality of patients and improve the satisfaction of clinical nursing, so it is safe and reliable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3