检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]防城港市畜牧站,广西防城港538001 [2]防城港市动物疫病预防控制中心,广西防城港538001
出 处:《肉类工业》2017年第6期53-55,共3页Meat Industry
摘 要:近年来国家不断加大病死畜禽无害化处理项目建设力度。以边境地区防城市为例,在走私动物无害化处理工作中比较传统深埋和工厂化处理两种不同方式的工作成效,结果表明:工厂化无害化处理在处理走私动物方面具有明显优势,不仅减少人员、降低处理成本、简化处理过程,而且在维护公共卫生安全和联合打击走私方面起到积极的推动作用。同时,还结合现实情况,对畜禽无害化处理工作目前存在的问题,提示了对策建议。The construction strength of harmless treatment project of died livestock and poultry was constantly increased in our country in recent years. Border area was taken as an example, the working effect of two different patterns including traditional deep - buried and industrial treatment was compared in harmless treatment project of smuggling animals. The results showed that industrial harmless treatment had obvious advantages in smuggling animal~ treatment. The industrial harmless treatment could not only reduce staff, decrease processing cost and simplify processing procedure, but also played a positive pro- moting role in maintenance public health safety and combined crack down on smuggling. Meanwhile, combined with current situation, some countermeasures and suggestions on the current existing problems in livestock and poultry harmless treatment project were put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28