检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜保忠[1]
机构地区:[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450046
出 处:《河南社会科学》2017年第5期64-69,共6页Henan Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13BFX074);河南省高校哲学社会科学基础研究重大项目(2016-15);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(15A630009)
摘 要:检察一体化体制之下,提出抗诉权和支持抗诉权分别由上下两级人民检察院行使,谓之"抗诉权分置"。该体制在防止抗诉权滥用、维护法治统一和权威的同时,带来上下级检察院之间以及检察院与法院之间如何协调的问题,集中体现在上级检察院制作的支持抗诉意见书上。作为一种虽无法律明文规定,但实践中约定俗成的法律文书,支持抗诉意见书在实际应用中导致诸多矛盾和冲突,包括如何实现控审分离原则和保障被告人辩护权等。解决之道在于坚持以审判为中心,明确支持抗诉意见书的法律地位和法律适用。Under the procuratorate integration system, the rights to raise and to support counterappeals are employed with two stages of the People' s Procuratorate. That is the so called separate allocation of conterappeal rights. This system can not only prevent the abuse of counterappeal rights and safeguard the unity and authority of legal institutions, but also coordinate the relation between the two states of People's Procuratorate and People's Court. This issue is clearly disclosed in the supporting right of counterappeal submissions. As an unwritten regulations and stereotyped legal documents, the supporting of counterappeal submissions induces several conflicts and controversies, including the principle to separate authorities to control and judge procedures and guarantee the defense right of defendants. In order to solve this problem, the legal system should centralize on the judgement procedures and definite the juridical status and legal application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200