检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭德荣 张引 杨芬红 徐学凡 赵新平[3] 武桂英[3]
机构地区:[1]上海市彭浦新村街道社区卫生服务中心,上海200435 [2]上海市天目西街道社区卫生服务中心,上海200070 [3]复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海200032
出 处:《中国初级卫生保健》2017年第6期54-55,63,共3页Chinese Primary Health Care
摘 要:目的了解家庭医生对签约糖尿病患者实施健康知识指导产生的影响力和信任度。方法对与家庭医生签约的1 035名2型糖尿病患者进行8个糖尿病防治知识传播途径的问卷调查。结果 1 035名调查对象中,100.0%的患者从家庭医生处获得相关糖尿病防治的健康知识,占获取健康知识途径总响应频数的39.0%,排列第一;对8个健康知识传播途径的信任度,家庭医生途径信任度最高,达95.8%;对家庭医生提供的防治知识是否满足,70.15%的调查对象认为还需进一步提供防治知识,26.28%的患者认为防治知识非常缺乏,需要家庭医生能够提供更多的糖尿病防治健康知识。结论签约糖尿病患者对家庭医生提供糖尿病防治知识的影响力和信任度均很高,对家庭医生提供的糖尿病防治知识满足度存在差异,对家庭医生糖尿病防治知识指导提出更高要求。OBJECTIVE To understand the influence and trust of family doctors on the implementation of health knowledge guidancewith contracted diabetic patients. METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted among 1 035 patients with type 2 diabetes melli-tus contracted with family doctors. RESULTS Among the 1 035 subjects, 100.0% of the patients received health knowledge about di-abetes mellitus from the family doctors,accounting for 39.0% of the total number of responses to health knowledge,ranking first.Judging the eight health knowledge resources,the highest degree of trust in the way of family doctors,up to 95.8%. 70.15% of therespondents believed that they needed further prevention and treatment of knowledge,26.28% of patients believe that prevention andtreatment of knowledge is very poor,and family doctors could provide more knowledge of diabetes prevention and treatment. CONCLUSION The family doctors had a high influence and trust degree on the diabetes health knowledge in diabetes patients,and thesatisfaction degree of health knowledge provided by family doctors was different,which put forward higher requirements for familydoctor's knowledge of diabetes prevention and treatment.
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.64.93