中国城际公路货运空间网络特征——基于“第一物流”网站数据  

The Characters of Intercity Freight Transport Networks in China——A Case Study on“FIRST CARGO”Platform

作　　者：刘正兵[1,2] 戴特奇[1,2] 廖聪[1,2] 胡科[1,2] 梁进社[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学地理学院,中国北京100875 [2]北京师范大学地理科学学部,中国北京100875

出　　处：《经济地理》2017年第6期28-35,共8页Economic Geography

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2015KJJCB30)

摘　　要：以中国286个地级及以上城市为基本研究单元，利用各城市间公路货运联系数据，采用社会网络法与GIS可视化对城际货运联系网络结构特征进行分析。结果发现，城市货运网络中心度的首位集中程度不高，少数城市节点对城市货运网络的支配不强，“长尾”分布特征相对较弱。区域网络中心度最高的城市大多数为省会城市，城市经济规模与网络中心度具有相关性。跨区城市货运网络受近邻效应影响，形成以广东、江苏、山东等地区的城市为主的联系格局，这些地区的城市与相邻地区货运联系较多。城际货运网络在空间组织上受距离衰减影响明显，各社团空间范围要大于城市群边界，与一些功能区范围相一致，社团中城市货运联系主要集中在东部地区。Intercity freight transport networks have become a new research field in intercity networks base on information platform, which can reflect related freight activities＇ spatial structure, but related researches are lacked. This article takes 286 prefecture cities in China as study units and uses social network analysis and GIS tools to analysis the freight transport networks characters bases on freight information. The results show as follows： intercity freight transport networks don＇t have a high primary Index. Some cities can＇t dominate the whole networks with a high primary degree, the ＂long tail＂ is not obvious. Provincial capital usually owns the highest degree in province, cities＇ economic scale has a statistic correlation with cities＇ degree. Intercity freight transport networks are impacted by the effect of proximity, Guangdong, Jiangsu and Shandong＇s cities control the cross-regional freight networks and have many freight connections to neighboring regions. Intercity freight transport networks form some social communities. These communities have a distance decay and their geographical scales are larger than urban agglomeration. Social communities also match to the functional regions and freight connections of communities mainly gather to the East region.

关 键 词：公路物流 城市 货运网络 中心度 社团 中国 

分 类 号：F129.9[经济管理—世界经济]