检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘经涛
机构地区:[1]北京中伦(青岛)律师事务所争议解决部,山东青岛266071
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2017年第2期94-99,共6页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:随着跨国投资的发展,企业的破产清算程序及相关诉讼越来越涉及到不同国家或地区之间的法律适用问题,与国际商事仲裁程序的冲突也日益凸显,尤其是在跨国破产程序中存在未决国际商事仲裁或国际商事仲裁协议的情况。通过比较国际立法、各主要国家破产立法及其对两大程序之间冲突的处理,以广受关注的英国法院所判决的Syska v.Vivendi为例证,阐述跨国破产程序与国际商事仲裁程序冲突的复杂性,并对《中华人民共和国企业破产法》第21条提出修改建议以回应两大程序冲突增加这一趋势的要求。With the development of cross-border investigation, the procedure of insolvency and relevant lawsuits are increas-ingly involved with applying laws of different countries and districts. The conflicts between the insolvency and international commercial arbitration have been increasingly emerging, especially when there is an unsettled international commercial arbi-tration or international commercial arbitration agreement. The article compares the insolvency legislations in major countries and the management of the conflicts between the procedure of bankruptcy liquidation and international commercial arbitration, it takes the case of Syska v. Vivendi as an example, aiming to elaborate the complexity of the conflicts between insolvency and international commercial arbitration. The article also offers proposals to modifying the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the Peo-pled Republic of China to accommodate the trends.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229