检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]衡阳市南华大学附属第二医院泌尿外科,421001
出 处:《中国社区医师》2017年第18期65-66,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:研究、对比经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术(TUERP)与经尿道双极等离子电切术(PKRP)治疗前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效及安全性。方法:收治BPH患者104例,随机平分成两组。研究组应用经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术进行治疗,对照组应用经尿道双极等离子电切术进行治疗,观察、分析患者的手术效果及安全性等。结果:治疗后,研究组手术情况明显优于对照组(P<0.05),研究组并发症较对照组也明显减少(P<0.05)。结论:BPH患者在临床治疗中选用TUERP,具有显著的效果。Objective:To study and compare the efficacy and safety of transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate and transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods:104 patients with BPH were randomly divided into the two groups on average.The research group was treated with transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate(TUERP),while the control group was treated with transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP).The effect and safety of the patients were observed and analyzed.Results:After treatment,the operation condition of the study group was significantly better than the control group(P<0.05).The complications in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Using TUERP surgery for BPH patients can get a significant clinical effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143