检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:车锦连[1] 谢锦兰[1] 薛元领[1] 郭雄全[1] 覃飞[1] 严达 陈伟华[1] 何凤连[1] 何智莲
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第七附属医院(梧州市工人医院)放射科,广西梧州543001
出 处:《医学影像学杂志》2017年第6期1091-1094,共4页Journal of Medical Imaging
基 金:广西梧州市科技攻关项目(编号:梧科字(2013)51号)
摘 要:目的探讨磁共振功能成像技术(DWI、DCE及MRS)在乳腺良恶性病变诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析57例经病理证实的乳腺疾病患者的DWI、DCE及MRS资料。结果 DWI的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为83.3%、90%、87.9%;DCE-TIC的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为70%、94.4%、77.5%;MRS的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为77.5%、72.2%、75.8%;联合诊断的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为90%、94.4%、91.4%。结论 DWI、DCE、MRS在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断方面各有优势,联合应用可提高病变诊断的准确性。Objective To explore the value of magnetic resonance functional imaging( DWI,Diffusion Weighted Imaging;DCE,Dynamic Contrast Enhance; MRS,Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods We retrospectively analyzed DWI,DCE and MRS data of 57 of patients with mammary gland disease. All patients were confirmed by pathology. Results The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of DWI are 83. 3%,90% and 87. 9% respectively. The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of DCE are 70%,94. 4%,77. 5% respectively. The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MRS are 77. 5%,72. 2%,75. 8% respectively. The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of combined diagnosis are 90%,94. 4%,91. 4%. Conclusion DWI,DCE and MRS have differential advantages in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Combined use of these three methods can improve the accuracy of disease diagnosis.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.9[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229