检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:封任冬[1] 张艳华[2] 薛艳[3] 方云芬[4]
机构地区:[1]云南省玉溪市第一人民医院(昆明医医科大学第六附属医院)放射科,云南玉溪653100 [2]云南省玉溪市第一人民医院(昆明医医科大学第六附属医院)超声科,云南玉溪653100 [3]云南省玉溪市第一人民医院(昆明医医科大学第六附属医院)乳腺科,云南玉溪653100 [4]云南省玉溪市第一人民医院(昆明医医科大学第六附属医院)病理科,云南玉溪653100
出 处:《医学影像学杂志》2017年第6期1099-1101,1108,共4页Journal of Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的探讨乳腺X线摄影与超声对0期及1期乳腺癌的临床诊断价值。方法回顾性分析经临床手术病理证实的0期及1期乳腺癌50例,并进行统计学处理,分析两种检查方法诊断0期及1期乳腺癌与病理诊断的符合率。结果乳腺X线摄影与病理诊断总符合率(46/50)92%;超声与病理诊断总符合率(38/50)76%,二者有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论乳腺X线摄影诊断0期及1期乳腺癌明显优于超声。Objective To investigate the clinical value of Mammography and Ultrasound in the diagnosis of stage 0 and stage1 breast cancer. Methods The coincidence rates between two kinds of checking method in the diagnosis of stage 0 and stage 1breast cancer and pathological diagnosis were analyzed after retrospectively analyzing and statistically processing 50 cases of stage0 and stage 1 breast cancer confirmed by clinical surgery pathology. Results The total compliance rate of Mammography and pathological diagnosis was 92%( 46/50),and that of Ultrasound and pathological diagnosis was 76%( 38/50),both had significant difference( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Mammography was significantly better than Ultrasound in diagnosis of stage 0 and stage 1 breast cancer.
分 类 号:R814.41[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.9[医药卫生—放射医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127