检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童敏[1] TONG Min(School of Humanity and Social Science,Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036 Chin)
机构地区:[1]安徽农业大学人文社会科学学院,安徽合肥230036
出 处:《河北法学》2017年第7期71-82,共12页Hebei Law Science
基 金:安徽农业大学稳定和引进人才科研资助项目:<刑事被害人权利保障机制研究>(wd2014-6)
摘 要:根据国内外相关法律规范总结分析,被害人谅解可能影响定罪和量刑的实体法本质是刑事责任减免的情节。事后的谅解行为无法改变已经完成的构成要件,只是影响可罚性进而影响责任的要素。被害人的态度和行为对于行为人责任的影响源自被害人地位重新崛起的背景。被害人谅解影响刑事责任的正当性根据在于刑法保护的被害人刑事处分自由的法益和其他法益之间的衡量,具体根据则在于报应前提下的预防必要性。By induction and summarization of Chinese and foreign related legislation and regulations, it's concluded that the entity essence of victim understandings effect on conviction and punishment is the plot of deduction or exemption of criminal responsibility. Subsequent conduct cannot change the completed constitutive elements of crime, but it can affect punishability then influence the criminal responsibility. The reason why victim understanding becomes one of the circumstances affecting the offender's criminal responsibility comes from the background that the victim 's status is improved. The justifiability is based on measurement between the freedom of criminal disposition and other law benefit protected by criminal law and the specific basis is the necessity of prevention under the premise of retribution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38