关于世界环境史研究发展的思考  

Thinking on the Development of World's Environment Historiography

作　　者：刘向阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《学术研究》2017年第6期101-109,共9页Academic Research

基　　金：国家社科基金"20世纪后期美国环境治理中工具性因素的作用异化研究"(11CSS006)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：从当下环境史发展的总体态势看,专题、区域和短时段的研究颇多,通史研究偏少。从史学理论和实践的角度看,时兴的世界环境史和各国的环境通史研究正是对此的回应,它们一定程度上克服了民族国家的阈限,展现了环境史构建自身世界史叙事范型的优势,但面对作为历史哲学的世界史与其具体史学实践之间的张力,尚未发展出理想的应对之策。在当今民族国家依然占据世界主导格局的情况下,环境史可以借鉴跨国史学的路径,发挥自身整体论、有机论与互动论的优势,追随人类生态足迹,构建自身的世界史叙事原则,方此既能弥合主权国家的边界与生态边界的冲突,推进世界史理论的创新,深化全球史研究,又能为当下全球环境问题的解决提供新的思路。According to the overall state of environmental history, most studies focus on the subject, regional and short-term topics. Both the world historiography and the general historiography in most countries respond to the orientation in the view of historical theory and historiography. In a way they overcome threshold of nation-states and present some advantage of constructing world paradigm in the perspective of environment history. In a condition of nation-state still occupying a leading position in contemporary world framework, environment history could use the route of transnational history, and take full advantage of holism, organism and interactionism, then constructing their own narrative principle of world history. It does not only bridge the conflict of sovereign boundary and ecological boundary, but also supply a new idea for solving global environmental dilemma.

关 键 词：环境史 世界史 世界环境史 跨国史学 

分 类 号：K061[历史地理—历史学]