检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京100048
出 处:《首都师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2017年第3期86-92,共7页Journal of Capital Normal University:Natural Science Edition
摘 要:随着旅游业的快速发展,旅游活动对旅游目的地的社会文化与生态环境造成一定程度的消极影响,使得旅游可持续发展受到严重制约.旅游可持续发展评价是分析其制约因素的有效途径,是旅游可持续发展研究的重要组成部分.本文通过对旅游可持续发展评价的相关文献进行系统性梳理,概括了国际上的几种评价指标框架与指标设置方法,并对旅游生态足迹法、旅游可持续晴雨表法以及综合评价法等主要的评价方法进行了介绍.研究认为,在现存的评价指标体系中维度的选择并不统一,并缺少对文化资源进行评价的指标研究;而各类评价方法均存在一定的优缺点,方法的综合运用将会成为新的研究方向;此外,旅游可持续等级评判标准的科学制定应得到一定的关注.With the rapid development of tourism, tourism activities have a negative impact on the socio-cultural and ecological in tourism destination, making sustainable tourism development (STD) has been severely constrained. Evaluation of STD is an effective way to analyze the impact factors, and is an important part in the research of STD. In this paper we will make a review on the indicator system and evaluation method. The results show that: First, there are no recognized indicator dimensions set, and lack of the research about culture indicators. Second, the integrated use of methods will become a new research direction, for that every assessment method has both advantages and disadvantages. Finally, the paper points that we should pay more attention on the standard setting in sustainable tourism grading criteria.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.169