反实证主义的“实证主义”——新分析法学哲学品格辨析  

Anti-Positivistic Positivism: A Clarification of the Philosophical Character of the New Analytical Jurisprudence

作　　者：胡欣诣[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海电机学院马克思主义学院

出　　处：《哲学分析》2017年第3期93-109,共17页Philosophical Analysis

基　　金："上海高校青年教师培养资助计划"科研项目"法律实证主义与哲学实证主义关系辨析"(项目编号:15U12)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：国内学界的传统观点认为,"分析法学"、"实证主义法学"、"法律实证主义"基本上是相同的概念,分析法学就是哲学中的实证主义思想运用于法学理论的产物。但以哈特、凯尔森为代表的20世纪新分析法学却是建立在与实证主义哲学极为迥异的哲学立场之上。作为一种法哲学流派,新分析法学虽然在法学上主要继承了法律实证主义的传统,但无论是作为哈特法律理论之基础的日常语言哲学,还是作为凯尔森纯粹法学之基础的新康德主义哲学,它们在哲学品格上都表现出反对实证主义哲学的特征,特别是反对实证主义哲学所具有的经验主义和科学主义的倾向。因此,新分析法学实质上是一种反实证主义的法哲学,法律实证主义与哲学实证主义也不是同一种意义上的"实证主义"。It is a traditional view that' analytical jurisprudence',' positivist jurisprudence' and'legal positivism' are the same concepts, and analytical jurisprudence is just the product of applying positivisticthought to the field of legal theory. However, the new analytical jurisprudence led by H.L.A Hart and Hans Kelsen in the twentieth century is founded on a philosophical standpoint which is quite different from positive philosophy. Although as a legal theory, it is mainly in the tradition of legal positivism, its philosophical character, embodied in Hart's ordinary language philosophy and Kelsen's neo-Kantianism, is opposed to the inclination of empiricism and scientism, namely the character of positive philosophy. In sum, the new analytical jurisprudence is essentially an anti-positivist legal philosophy, and legal positivism and philosophical positivism are not of the same kind of' positivism'

关 键 词：分析法学 实证主义 反实证主义 哲学品格 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]