46例慢性心衰患者开展综合护理干预的工作体会  

Experience of Carrying out Comprehensive Nursing Intervention in 46 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

作　　者：侯春菊[1] 赵颖[2] 刘爽[1] 陈鸿[1] 鞠建新[1] 

机构地区：[1]牡丹江医学院附属红旗医院,黑龙江牡丹江157000 [2]牡丹江医学院附属第二医院

出　　处：《中国医学创新》2017年第18期83-86,共4页Medical Innovation of China

摘　　要：目的:探讨对慢性心衰患者最佳的护理方法。方法:将2015年12月-2016年12月本院入院治疗的92例慢性心衰患者分为对照组和观察组。对照组采取传统护理方法,观察组在对照组基础上进行综合护理干预。从患者心理情况评分、患者对护士护理工作的满意度和患者生活质量对两组护理效果进行评价。结果:入院时,两组的焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);出院时,两组的SAS和SDS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组护理满意度为95.65%,明显高于对照组的73.91%(P<0.05)。两组精神状态、体力和日常情绪等5项内容比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对慢性心衰患者采取综合护理的方法,效果显著。Objective：To explore the best nursing methods for patients with chronic heart failure（CHF）.Method：A total of 92 patients with chronic heart failure who were admitted to our hospital from December 2015 to December 2016 were divided into the control group and the observation group.The control group was taken with traditional nursing method,the observation group was taken with comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of the control group.Patients＇ psychological situation,nursing satisfaction and quality of life in two groups were evaluated.Result：There were no significant differences in self-rating anxiety scale（SAS） and self-rating depression scale（SDS） of two groups at admissionin（P〉0.05）;there were significant differences in SAS and SDS of two groups at discharge（P〈0.05）.Nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 95.65%,significantly higher than 73.91% of the control group（P〈0.05）.There were significant differences in mental state,strength,daily emotion and other indexes of two groups（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with chronic heart failure has significant effect.

关 键 词：慢性心衰 综合护理干预 心理情况评分 护理满意度 生活质量 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]