舒适护理对急性心肌梗死合并应激性高血糖患者介入治疗术后的影响  

Impact of Comfort Care on stress hyperglycemia with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention

作　　者：苟燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]雅安市人民医院,四川雅安625000

出　　处：《国际心血管病杂志》2017年第A01期25-25,共1页International Journal of Cardiovascular Disease

摘　　要：目的：探讨舒适护理对急性心肌梗死合并虚激性高血糖患者介入治疗术后的影响。方法：入选200例行介入治疗（percutancous coronary intervention，PCI）的心肌梗死合并应激性高血搪患者，随机分为两组，对照组进行常规护理，研究组则在常规护理基础上进行舒适护理干预。对比两组患者住院期间不良反应发生情况、舒适满意度及住院天数。同时应用生活质量评价量表SF-36评价患者出院后生活质量改善情况。结果：与对照组患者相比，研究组患者对护理工作满意度及自身舒适度均明显增高（均P〈0．05），且住院天数明显缩短（P〈0．05）。此外，研究组患者SF-36量表中的身体机能、躯体角色、总体健康、活力、角色情绪维度均较对照组患者高（均P〈0.05）。结论：舒适护理可提高急性高心肌梗死合并应激性高血糖患者介入治疗术后舒适度、满意度，减少不良反应发生，并缩短住院天数，改善患者的生活质量。Objective ：Impact of Comfort Care on stress hyperglycemia with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention （p-PCI）. Methods：We retrospectively analyzed 200 consecutive elderly patients with AMI. All patients were treated with p-PCI. Patients were divided into two groups, routine care group and Comfort Care group. These patients were compared with respect to adverse events, comfort satisfaction and hospital days. ＇Ihe postoperative QOL were evaluated by Short-Form life survey-36 items （SF-36）. Results：Comfort satisfaction were higher in the Comfort Care group （P〈0.05）. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter（P〈0.05）. The physical function, role physical, general health, vitality, role emotional dimensions were significantly higher in Patients with Comfort Care （P〈0.05）. Conclusion：Comfort Care might have improved comfort satisfaction on stress hyperglycemia with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients experienced a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and hospital days, with improved quality of life.

关 键 词：急性心肌梗死 应激性高血糖 舒适护理 介入治疗 生活质量评价量表SF-36 患者 术后 护理工作满意度 

分 类 号：R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]