检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁省海军大连舰艇学院政治系医疗所,116001 [2]辽宁省大连市友谊医院神内ICU
出 处:《中国实用医药》2017年第16期156-157,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨优质护理方法对2型糖尿病患者的预后及生活方式的影响。方法 100例2型糖尿病患者作为本次研究的对象,并根据抛硬币的方法随机将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。对照组采取常规护理,观察组采取优质护理,比较两组患者各项指标情况(糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平)、生活质量评分情况以及护理满意度。结果护理后,观察组患者糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平分别为(5.2±0.9)%、(4.2±0.3)mmol/L、(7.1±3.5)mmol/L,对照组患者糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平分别为(6.9±1.1)%、(6.6±0.4)mmol/L、(8.9±2.4)mmol/L,观察组患者各项指标均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组在护理后躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能和物质生活方面评分分别为(65.2±3.1)、(44.9±4.2)、(60.7±4.8)、(52.4±4.5)分,对照组的评分分别为(51.9±4.9)、(38.6±5.2)、(53.8±4.9)、(56.6±3.7)分,观察组患者的各项指标评分均优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度(96.0%)明显高于对照组(82.0%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优质护理方法对2型糖尿病患者的预后及生活方式的影响深远,值得进一步推广应用。Objective To investigate influence by high quality nursing on prognosis and lifestyle of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Methods A total of 100 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as study subjects were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the observation group received high quality nursing. Comparison was made on indexes(glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose), quality of life score and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. Results After nursing, the observation group had glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose levels respectively as(5.2±0.9)%,(4.2±0.3) mmol/L and(7.1±3.5) mmol/L, and the control group had glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose levels respectively as(6.9±1.1)%,(6.6±0.4) mmol/L and(8.9±2.4) mmol/L. The observation group had all better indexes than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). The observation group had scores of physical function, mental function, social function and material life after nursing respectively as(65.2±3.1),(44.9±4.2),(60.7±4.8) and(52.4±4.5) points, which were respectively(51.9±4.9),(38.6±5.2),(53.8±4.9) and(56.6±3.7) points in the control group. The observation group had all better scores than the control group(P〈0.05). The observation group had much higher nursing satisfaction degree(96.0%) than the control group(82.0%), and their difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05).Conclusion High quality nursing shows significant influence on prognosis and lifestyle of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, and this method is worth further promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28