检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱华阔
出 处:《绵阳师范学院学报》2017年第6期30-34,共5页Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
摘 要:在英国,行政裁判所是止息行政争议的机构。但它在产生之初也遇到了诸如体系混乱、独立性弱等问题。经过多年发展,裁判所的体系渐趋统一,独立性与专业性都得到了增强。目前我国的行政复议制度面临诸多难题,而裁判所的发展历程对完善该制度有一定启示:首先,独立与公正联系密切,复议机构的独立性需增强;其次,专业性影响着争议处理结果的公正性,复议机构的专业性亦需加强;最后,制度的完善是一个过程,需不断为之。In Britain,administrative tribunal is aninstitution whose duty is resolving administrative disputes.But it also met a number of problems at the beginning,such as chaotic system and weak independence. After years of development,the system of tribunal has become more and more unified,and its' independence and speciality have also been enhanced. At present in China,the administrative review system is confronted with a series of problems,therefore this paper holds that some enlightenments can be borrowed from the analysis of the development process of administrative tribunal. Firstly,the independence of institution of administrative review should be enhanced due to the close connection between independence and justice. Secondly,the speciality of administrative review institution should be improved now that better speciality brings about more convincing justice in administrative disputes. Furthermore,the improvement of this system is a process,which requires endless effort.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7