日本《南海周边领土问题》报告中的关键日期问题评析  

Comment on the Critical Date in the Japanese Report of the Territorial Issue in the South China Sea

作　　者：疏震娅[1,2] 张颖[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026 [2]国家海洋局海洋发展战略研究所,北京100161 [3]南京大学中国南海研究协同创新中心,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《河海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第3期84-89,共6页Journal of Hohai University：Philosophy and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(41401142);国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD051);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(12JZD048)

摘　　要：关键日期是考察国际法争端中法律关系的时间维度,是争议的法律关系已经明确化的日期。关键日期对确认争端中的事实有重要意义,对证据材料的可采性有重要影响。日本有关研究将日本二战后放弃南沙群岛的时间确定为南沙群岛领土主权争端的关键日期,得出南沙群岛是主权归属不明的争议领土的结论。关键日期只适用于考察争端当事方之间的法律关系,与第三方无关。日本对南沙群岛的非法行为不能作为确定南沙群岛领土争端关键日期的依据,也无法改变南沙群岛是中国领土的法律地位。As the temporal dimension for examining the legal relationship in international law,the critical date is the date when the legal relationship of a dispute crystallizes. The critical date plays an important role in recognizing the facts of a dispute and has significant impact on the admissibility of evidence. Some Japanese researchers regards the date when Japan renounced Nansha Islands after the World War II as the critical date of the territorial sovereignty dispute of Nansha Island,and accordingly conclude that the territorial sovereignty of Nansha Islands is disputable. This paper holds that the critical date is only applicable to the legal relationship between the disputing parties,and therefore has nothing to do with the third party. The illegal acts of Japan can neither serve as a basis for determining the critical date of Nansha Islands,nor change the legal status of Nansha Islands as Chinese territory.

关 键 词：领土主权 南沙群岛 关键日期 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]