《民法总则》“民事权利章”的得与失  

The Gain and Loss of the “Civil Rights”Chapter of General Provisions of Civil Law

作　　者：叶金强[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2017年第3期645-655,共11页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金：2014年度国家社会科学基金重大项目"中国民法重述;民法典编纂与社会主义市场经济法律制度的完善"(14ZDC018)的阶段性研究成果之一

摘　　要：民法总则》制定过程中的"通则思维"危害极大,"民事权利章"是其典型表现。在民法典分则会对各项民事权利作详尽规定的预设之下,没有必要再设"民事权利章"。《民法总则》在人格利益保护方面,采行了人格利益保护一般条款加具体人格权之模式,个人信息保护则采行为规制模式,这均应予以肯定。"民事权利章"之中的现有财产权规定应予删除,以免出现财产权规则分置于总则和分则的局面。荣誉权之规定也应当删除。In the process of making ＂General Rules of Civil Code＂, the ＂Tong Ze＂ thinking is of great harm, with Civil Rights Chapter as its typical manifestation. There is no need to set up the Civil Rights Chapter under the assumption that the civil code will stipulate the civil rights in detail. It should be affirmed that General provisions along with provisions for specific personal rights are adopted in order to protect personal interests, while the pattern of behavior regulation is adopted for the aim of protecting personal information. The provisions of property rights in the civil rights chapter should be deleted lest the rules of property rights be placed both in the general and specific part of the ＂Civil Code＂. In the end, the provisions for right of honor should be deleted as well.

关 键 词：民事权利章 人格保护一般条款 行为规制模式 荣誉权 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]