论传统侵财罪的保护法益——基于实质所有权说的法理阐释  

On Protected Legal Interest of Traditional Crime against Property

作　　者：魏东[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2017年第4期88-96,共9页Law Review

基　　金：2012年度国家社科基金项目重点课题"刑法解释原理与实证问题研究"(12AFX009)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：侵财罪保护法益"所有权说"与"占有说"之争的焦点,不在于他人财产所有权是否可以成为侵财罪的保护法益,而在于单纯的占有是否可以充足侵财罪的保护法益。侵财罪保护法益的实质所有权说,既是侵财罪的入罪立法论根据,也是侵财罪的解释论根据。刑法解释论上应采用侵财罪保护法益的实质所有权说,特别注意基于犯罪对象物之"财产所有权"与基于犯罪被害人之"他人"的实质化审查,从法理上厘清司法实践中众多疑难案件的定性处理问题,依法将那些侵犯实质所有权的行为解释为侵财罪。Proprietorship Theory and Occupation Theory, two theories about the protected legal interest of invading property crime, the controversial point of which does not lie in whether others＇ property ownership right can become the pro- tected interest of invading property crime or not, but whether pure occupational status can be the protected interest of invading property crime. The theory of substantial proprietorship, one of the theories about the protected interest of invading property crime, is not only the theoretical gist of criminalized legislation, but also the gist of criminal law interpretation. The theory of substantial proprietorship should be adopted by the theory of criminal law interpretation in the aspect of the protected interest of invading property crime, especially noticing the substantial examination towards property ownership right based on crime targets and other people based on crime victims, clarifying qualitative problems of numerous hard cases from the nomological perspective in judicial practice, ipso jure interpreting the acts that invade the substantial proprietorship as crimes.

关 键 词：侵财罪 保护法益 他人财产所有权 实质所有权说 刑法解释 

分 类 号：D920.5[政治法律—法学] D924.3