以禁令制度弥补环境公益诉讼民事责任之不足——美国经验的启示与借鉴  

Making up the Deficiencies of Civil Liabilities in Environmental Public Interest Litigation by Injunctions——Enlightenment and Reference of American Experience

作　　者：巩固[1] 陈瑶[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2017年第4期46-56,共11页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心研究成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助

摘　　要：我国环境民事公益诉讼责任制度存在名实不副、合法性欠缺、保障机制不足、执行责任乏力等问题,不利于诉讼追求的公益目的的最终实现。美国公民诉讼中的禁令制度类型丰富、范围广泛,内容灵活,便于操作,并有良好的监督机制和严格的执行责任保障,效果良好。我国应借鉴美国经验,在环境公益诉讼领域探索禁令制度,弥补现行制度之不足。Abstract ： China＇ s environmental civil public interest litigation liability system is facing the problems of incon- sistence with the name, lacking of legitimacy, lacking of security mechanisms, fatigue of the implementation of the responsibility, which are not conducive to the pursuit of the ultimate goal of public interest. Injunctions in citizen suits of the United States share the advantages of multiple types, wide variety, flexible content, easy operation,a good monitoring mechanism and strict penalty to protect implementation of the responsibility. It＇ s necessary for China to learn from the United States to explore the injunction system in the field of environmental public interests litigation to make up for the deficiencies of current system.

关 键 词：环境公益诉讼 民事责任 禁令 美国 

分 类 号：D922.69[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]